legal_think

Analyze complex legal issues, build structured arguments, and verify compliance with domain-specific guidance and templates. Supports citations, revisions, and thought quality feedback for comprehensive legal reasoning.

Instructions

A powerful tool for structured legal reasoning that helps analyze complex legal issues. This tool provides domain-specific guidance and templates for different legal areas including ANSC contestations, consumer protection, and contract analysis.

When to use this tool:

Breaking down complex legal problems into structured steps
Analyzing legal requirements and compliance
Verifying that all elements of a legal test are addressed
Building comprehensive legal arguments with proper citations

Key features:

Automatic detection of legal domains
Domain-specific guidance and templates
Support for legal citations and references
Revision capabilities for refining legal arguments
Thought quality feedback

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`category`	No	Category of legal reasoning (optional, will be auto-detected if not provided)
`isRevision`	No	Whether this thought revises a previous legal reasoning (optional)
`nextThoughtNeeded`	Yes	Whether another thought step is needed
`references`	No	References to laws, regulations, precedents, or previous thoughts (optional)
`requestGuidance`	No	Set to true to receive domain-specific legal guidance
`requestTemplate`	No	Set to true to receive a template for this type of legal reasoning
`revisesThoughtNumber`	No	The thought number being revised (if isRevision is true)
`thought`	Yes	The main legal reasoning content
`thoughtNumber`	Yes	Current thought number
`totalThoughts`	Yes	Estimated total thoughts needed

Input Schema (JSON Schema)

{
  "properties": {
    "category": {
      "description": "Category of legal reasoning (optional, will be auto-detected if not provided)",
      "enum": [
        "analysis",
        "planning",
        "verification",
        "legal_reasoning",
        "ansc_contestation",
        "consumer_protection",
        "contract_analysis"
      ],
      "type": "string"
    },
    "isRevision": {
      "description": "Whether this thought revises a previous legal reasoning (optional)",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "nextThoughtNeeded": {
      "description": "Whether another thought step is needed",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "references": {
      "description": "References to laws, regulations, precedents, or previous thoughts (optional)",
      "items": {
        "type": "string"
      },
      "type": "array"
    },
    "requestGuidance": {
      "description": "Set to true to receive domain-specific legal guidance",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "requestTemplate": {
      "description": "Set to true to receive a template for this type of legal reasoning",
      "type": "boolean"
    },
    "revisesThoughtNumber": {
      "description": "The thought number being revised (if isRevision is true)",
      "type": "integer"
    },
    "thought": {
      "description": "The main legal reasoning content",
      "type": "string"
    },
    "thoughtNumber": {
      "description": "Current thought number",
      "minimum": 1,
      "type": "integer"
    },
    "totalThoughts": {
      "description": "Estimated total thoughts needed",
      "minimum": 1,
      "type": "integer"
    }
  },
  "required": [
    "thought",
    "thoughtNumber",
    "totalThoughts",
    "nextThoughtNeeded"
  ],
  "type": "object"
}

Cerebra Legal MCP Server

legal_think

Instructions

Input Schema

Input Schema (JSON Schema)

Other Tools from Cerebra Legal MCP Server

Related Tools

MCP directory API